MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071262432 · doi:10.1097/rli.0000000000000003

Quantifying Vascular Heterogeneity Using Microbubble Disruption-Replenishment Kinetics in Patients With Renal Cell Cancer

2013· article· en· W2071262432 on OpenAlexafffund
John M. Hudson, Ross Williams, Raffi Karshafian, Laurent Milot, Mostafa Atri, Peter N. Burns, Georg A. Bjarnason

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Radiology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalHealth Sciences CentreToronto General HospitalToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLog-normal distributionMedicineMathematicsUltrasoundStatisticsMicrocirculationContrast-enhanced ultrasoundNuclear medicineBiomedical engineeringInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to establish the physiological interpretation of the shape parameter of the dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) lognormal perfusion model and to evaluate the clinical significance of the parameter in a sample of patients undergoing antiangiogenic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The physiological interpretation of the lognormal shape parameter was explored using computer simulations of disruption-replenishment in fractal models of the microcirculation generated by a piecewise iterative algorithm in MATLAB. Architectural variety was accomplished by introducing random perturbations to the diameter, length, and branching angles to the growing vascular tree. The shape parameter was extracted from the time-intensity curves and compared with the transit time distributions calculated directly from the simulations. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound data were obtained from 31 consenting patients with mRCC being treated with antiangiogenic therapy. Lognormal parameters related to the blood volume, mean flow speed, and vascular morphology/heterogeneity extracted before, during, and after therapy were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS). Cox proportional hazard ratios were calculated alongside receiver operator characteristics for different combinations of the vascular parameters to determine their ability to distinguish patients who would progress early (less than the median PFS) versus late (greater than the median PFS). RESULTS: The lognormal shape parameter correlated strongly to the width of the transit time distribution calculated directly from the simulations, and by extension, to the morphology/heterogeneity of the microvascular network (Spearman r = 0.80, P < 0.001, n = 28). Shorter time to progression was predicted by higher baseline heterogeneity (P = 0.003) and a reduction in tumor blood volume less than 43% (P = 0.002) after 2 weeks of treatment. Combining baseline parameters with changes that occur shortly after starting treatment increased the sensitivity and specificity of DCE-US to identify which patients would progress/resist therapy early versus late compared with when the vascular parameters were considered in isolation. CONCLUSIONS: The DCE-US shape parameter from the lognormal perfusion model is representative of microvascular morphology/heterogeneity and may be used to noninvasively characterize the vascular architecture of cancer lesions. A more abnormal flow distribution at baseline predicts for poorer outcome for patients treated with antiangiogenic therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer. Combining pretreatment and on-treatment measurements of vascularity can improve the performance of DCE-US to predict which patients will progress earlier versus later when on antiangiogenic therapy for mRCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative RadiologySame topicMRI in cancer diagnosisFrench-language works237,207