MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071278452 · doi:10.1119/1.1336836

Regular coordinate systems for Schwarzschild and other spherical spacetimes

2001· article· en· W2071278452 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRelativity and Gravitational Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSchwarzschild radiusDeriving the Schwarzschild solutionKerr metricSchwarzschild geodesicsSchwarzschild metricGeneral relativityContext (archaeology)Classical mechanicsSpacetimeCoordinate timeEvent horizonSpherical coordinate systemCoordinate systemHorizonMathematical physicsTheoretical physicsGeometryGravitationMathematicsQuantum mechanicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The continuation of the Schwarzschild metric across the event horizon is a well-understood problem discussed in most textbooks on general relativity. Among the most popular coordinate systems that are regular at the horizon are the Kruskal–Szekeres and Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates. Our first objective in this paper is to popularize another set of coordinates, the Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinates. These were first introduced in the 1920s, and have been periodically rediscovered since; they are especially attractive and pedagogically powerful. Our second objective is to provide generalizations of these coordinates, first within the specific context of Schwarzschild spacetime, and then in the context of more general spherical spacetimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it