MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071278452 · doi:10.1119/1.1336836

Regular coordinate systems for Schwarzschild and other spherical spacetimes

2001· article· en· W2071278452 on OpenAlexaff
Karl Martel, Eric Poisson

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRelativity and Gravitational Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSchwarzschild radiusDeriving the Schwarzschild solutionKerr metricSchwarzschild geodesicsSchwarzschild metricGeneral relativityContext (archaeology)Classical mechanicsSpacetimeCoordinate timeEvent horizonSpherical coordinate systemCoordinate systemHorizonMathematical physicsTheoretical physicsGeometryGravitationMathematicsQuantum mechanicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The continuation of the Schwarzschild metric across the event horizon is a well-understood problem discussed in most textbooks on general relativity. Among the most popular coordinate systems that are regular at the horizon are the Kruskal–Szekeres and Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates. Our first objective in this paper is to popularize another set of coordinates, the Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinates. These were first introduced in the 1920s, and have been periodically rediscovered since; they are especially attractive and pedagogically powerful. Our second objective is to provide generalizations of these coordinates, first within the specific context of Schwarzschild spacetime, and then in the context of more general spherical spacetimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations236
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of PhysicsSame topicRelativity and Gravitational TheoryFrench-language works237,207