MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071295298 · doi:10.1021/je015528d

Viscosities and Excess Properties of Aqueous Solutions of Mono- and Diethylethanolamines at Temperatures between 298.15 and 353.15 K

2002· article· en· W2071295298 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicThermodynamic properties of mixtures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAqueous solutionViscous flowViscosityThermodynamicsAtmospheric temperature rangeViscous liquidRange (aeronautics)Flow (mathematics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyPhysical chemistryMechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Viscosities of aqueous solutions of monoethylethanolamine and diethylethanolamine have been measured at temperatures from 298.15 to 353.15 K over the entire range of concentrations. The excess activation energies for viscous flow and the excess entropies for viscous flow have been calculated for these aqueous solutions in this temperature range. The viscosities, excess activation energies for viscous flow, and the excess entropies for viscous flow of these solutions have been compared with our earlier values for aqueous solutions of monoethanolamine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it