MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071296558 · doi:10.1002/jnr.20983

Heat shock protein 27 is involved in neurite extension and branching of dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro

2006· article· en· W2071296558 on OpenAlexaff
Kristy L. Williams, Masuma Rahimtula, Karen M. Mearow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHsp27NeuriteCytoskeletonCell biologyDorsal root ganglionBiologyActin cytoskeletonActinHeat shock proteinNeuroscienceIn vitroHsp70CellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alteration of the cytoskeleton in response to growth factors and extracellular matrix proteins is necessary for neurite growth. The cytoskeletal components, such as actin and tubulin, can be modified through interaction with other cellular proteins, including the small heat shock protein Hsp27. Our previous work suggested that Hsp27 influences neurite growth, potentially via its phosphorylation state interactions with actin. To investigate further the role of Hsp27 in neurite outgrowth of adult dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, we have both down-regulated endogenous Hsp27 and expressed exogenous Hsp27. Down-regulation of Hsp27 with Hsp27 siRNA resulted in a decrease of neuritic tree length and complexity. In contrast, expression of exogenous Hsp27 in these neurons resulted in an increase in neuritic tree length and branching. Collectively, these results demonstrate that Hsp27 may play a role in neuritic growth via modulation of the actin cytoskeleton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience ResearchSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207