MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071322763 · doi:10.2118/97772-ms

Unlocking the Potential: A North Sea Heavy-Oil Success Story

2005· article· en· W2071322763 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Wylde, Graham Williams, R. E. Cousins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShetlandSuiteProduction (economics)Project commissioningProcess (computing)Computer scienceCompletion (oil and gas wells)Systems engineeringManufacturing engineeringEngineeringPetroleum engineeringOperations researchEngineering managementPublishingOceanographyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper gives details concerning one of the newest producing fields in the North Sea, West of Shetland development. Examples of the pre-start up design and implementation challenges are dwelt on, as well as the philosophy taken when commissioning the plant and chemical injection facilities. The majority of the paper focuses on the first 6 months of production history and the way in which the management of production techniques was performed and in particular how actual operations differed to the planned and designed specifications. With production of a 20° API crude, significant operational challenges have been encountered with initial start up being a staged and controlled process. Details are given to the suite of production chemicals required to give complete flow assurance as well as to maintain plant integrity. The onset of water production brings with it a whole suite of different challenges with by far the most difficult being demulsification and this has been given particular attention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207