MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Research on Aviation Electric Power Cyber Physical Systems

2013· article· en· W2071323538 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jian Bo Hu, Fei Li, Jun Wu, Jian Hao Wang, Li Peng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersZhejiang UniversityState Key Laboratory of Industrial Control TechnologyOntario Federation for Cerebral Palsy
KeywordsCyber-physical systemAviationElectric power systemElectric powerSystems engineeringEngineeringKey (lock)ArchitectureComputer sciencePower (physics)Control engineeringComputer securityAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More Electric Aircraft (MEA), which is the developing trend of the next generation of aircraft, put forward high demands on the electric power system. Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are a kind of novel intelligent systems with computation resources and controlled physical objects tightly integrated and interacted in the future network environment. CPS have the characteristics of real-time, synchronous, security, efficient and autonomous. This paper first elaborates the notion, characteristics, operation mechanism and technical challenges of CPS. The strategy of CPS-based next aviation electric power systems is presented. Then, the architecture of aviation electric power cyber physical systems is established. Finally, key technologies of aviation electric power cyber physical systems, including data bus, control strategies, energy management, security analysis, modeling and simulation, standardized and so on, are discussed. And directions are pointed out to offer a reference for the application of CPS in aviation electric power systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207