MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071340032 · doi:10.1097/cej.0b013e32835b3813

Case–control study of inflammatory markers and the risk of endometrial cancer

2012· article· en· W2071340032 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cancer Prevention · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical ResearchFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleCanada Research ChairsCancer Research Institute
KeywordsEndometrial cancerMedicineOdds ratioInternal medicineC-reactive proteinConfidence intervalPopulationCancerCase-control studyRisk factorOncologyUterine cancerGastroenterologyInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic inflammation may be important in endometrial cancer etiology. Several established endometrial cancer risk factors, particularly obesity, are hypothesized to operate through this pathway by increasing proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and acute-phase protein C-reactive protein (CRP). This study sought to investigate the association between inflammatory markers and the risk of endometrial cancer (types I and II). We recruited 519 incident endometrial cancer cases and 964 frequency age-matched controls in this population-based case-control study in Alberta (Canada) from 2002 to 2006. Participants completed in-person interviews, were assessed for anthropometric measures, and provided 8-h fasting blood samples either preoperatively or postoperatively. Blood was analyzed for the concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP by immunoassay. Endometrial cancer cases had consistently higher mean levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP compared with controls in these predominantly postmenopausal women. After adjusting for age, all markers were associated with statistically significant increased risks for endometrial cancer; however, after multivariable adjustment, only the risk from CRP remained elevated (odds ratio=1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.47). Similarly, upon stratification by cancer type, only CRP was associated positively with an increased risk for type I endometrial cancer (odds ratio=1.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.52). All markers were associated with an elevated risk for the more rare and aggressive type II cancers; however, these findings were statistically nonsignificant, likely because of the small number of cases in this group. In conclusion, we found epidemiologic evidence for an association between CRP and the risk of endometrial cancer, which was slightly stronger for type I cancer. No associations emerged for TNF-α and IL-6.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it