Luminescent Coordination Polymers Built Upon Cu<sub>4</sub>X<sub>4</sub> (X=Br,I) Clusters and Mono‐ and Dithioethers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on the syntheses, structures, and luminescence properties of 1D, 2D, and 3D coordination polymers built upon the tetranuclear Cu(4) X(4) clusters and mono- and dithioether assembling ligands. A review of the relevant literature is presented along with our own results stressing on the salient features of the interactions between the CuI salt as the starting material and the thioethers. Among the features, the solvato- (lost or gain of a monothioether or solvent molecule) and luminescence thermochromism (temperature dependence of the emission) of the solids, and the enhanced versatility of the CuI salt to form clusters of different nuclearity (Cu(2) I(2) , Cu(4) I(4) , Cu(6) I(6) ) and structures (closed cubane, partially open "flower-basket-like" cubane, and open cubane) upon the reaction conditions and ligands, are described. The steady state and time-resolved solid-state emission and excitation spectra (at 298 and 77 K) as well as the emission lifetimes are examined. Simple and apparently "innocent" modification may have a drastic effect on the polymer network and cluster structures, but this paper finds no obvious trend for the moment except for the ligand rigidity. The rhombic Cu(2) I(2) and closed-cubane Cu(4) I(4) clusters are the most encountered motifs whereas the open-flower-basket Cu(4) I(4) cubane and the hexagonal Cu(6) I(6) clusters are scarce.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it