MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071344547 · doi:10.4161/cc.9.21.13578

Laminin regulates PI3K basal localization and activation to sustain STAT5 activation

2010· article· en· W2071344547 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ren Xu, Virginia A. Spencer, Dinah Levy Groesser, Mina J. Bissell

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Cancer InstituteMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsRAC1BiologyCell biologyPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwaySTAT5Signal transductionPhosphorylationTranscription factorPhosphoinositide 3-kinaseBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular matrix (ECM) is a key regulator of tissue morphogenesis and functional differentiation in the mammary gland. We showed recently that laminin-111 (LN1) together with prolactin induces β-casein expression in mammary epithelial cells (MECs) by sustaining STAT5 activation. Others have shown that Rac1 is required for integrin-mediated STAT5 activation, but molecules upstream of Rac1 remain to be elucidated. Here, we show that exposure to three-dimensional (3D) laminin-rich ECM (LrECM) gels changes the localization of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) in MECs from diffuse to basal accompanied with the activation of PI3K-Rac1 signaling pathway. We show by co-immunoprecipitation that Rac1 associates with STAT5, and that LrECM treatment enhances this interaction. Blocking PI3K with LY294002 inhibits LrECM-dependent Rac1 activation, attenuates sustained STAT5 phosphorylation and blocks β-casein gene transcription. These results indicate that PI3K is a key mediator of the LN1-induced signaling cascade which controls the activity of transcription factors essential for tissue-specific gene expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207