Le port de Montréal à la veille de l’ouverture de la nouvelle voie navigable du Saint-Laurent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A few months before the opening of the new St. Lawrence Seaway, the author reappraises the effects of the Project on the Port of Montréal. Analysing the conclusions and recommendations of three studies published in 1957 and 1958, the Report of the ToIIs Committee of the St. Lawrence Seaway, the Report of the Royal Commission on Coastal Trade, and the report published by the Faculty of Commerce of McGill University, The Impact of the St. Lawrence Seaway on the Montréal Area, one comes to the conclusion that the Port of Montréal will remain a grain transhipment centre, but will lose a good part of its general cargo trade to Great Lakes ports. The loss of general cargo tonnage is estimated at 650,000 tons. In conclusion, several factors that may contribute to keep Montréal the leading oceanic port on the Seaway are stressed : 1. the imponderables ; 2. the Lachine rapids that are reduced in size by the new canal, but do not disappear; 3. competition between different types of vessels ; and, 4. traffic congestion in the waterway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".