MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071358640 · doi:10.14740/jcgo.v4i1.266

Successful Surgical Removal of Symptomatic Intravenous Leiomyomatosis With Intracardiac Extension Completely Tamponating the Entire Right Atrium and Ventricle

2015· article· en· W2071358640 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Tenzer, Jan Sebastian Wolter, Stefan Gattenlöhner, P. Roth, Ahmed Koshty, Hans‐Rudolf Tinneberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntracardiac injectionVentricleRight atriumInferior vena cavaHysterectomyExtracorporeal circulationSurgeryVeinLeiomyomaCardiac TumorsLeiomyomatosisRadiologyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a rare benign tumor, intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) can spread into the heart and lead to severe cardiac symptoms. A 50-year-old woman presented with progredient dyspnoea after hysterectomy for intrauterine leiomyoma 2 years ago. Diagnostic imaging revealed a tumor in the right atrium continuing from the right ovary passing within the right ovarian vein and the dilated inferior vena cava. The patient underwent a one-stage combined surgical operation with extracorporeal circulation in cooperation with gynecologists, cardiac surgeons and vascular surgeons. The tumor could be removed  en bloc by access from the right atrium. The histological examination revealed IVL after hysterectomy. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2015;4(1):179-183 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcgo266w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207