Les amants maudits : heurs et malheurs du couple religion et politique en Europe à l’aube du troisième millénaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les liens entre religion et politique sont anciens et les études les concernant, relativement nombreuses. En France, le modèle dominant des années soixante — montrant l’intensité de la relation entre vote à droite et intégration au catholicisme — est aujourd’hui remis en question. Les modèles concurrents insistent sur le pluralisme du catholicisme et sur les conséquences politiques plurielles. L’article se propose, d’une part, d’examiner la pertinence de deux modèles, et, d’autre part, de les tester en les appliquant à divers pays d’Europe. Les résultats montrent que la relation entre religion et politique demeure intense et relativement stable, quel que soit le pays étudié ou la religion prise en considération. Ainsi, même si des aménagements au premier paradigme sont nécessaires, il n’en reste pas moins que celui-ci demeure valide pour analyser le couple religion et politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".