MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071383001 · doi:10.7202/600777ar

Évaluation d’un programme de périnatalité, région de Québec

2008· article· fr· W2071383001 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Pierre Lafontaine

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Saint-Sacrement
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S’étant vu confier par le Ministère des Affaires sociales la responsabilité de mettre sur pied un programme de périnatalité, quatre (4) Départements de santé communautaire de la région immédiate de Québec ont uni leurs efforts en vue de réaliser les objectifs fixés. A l’heure actuelle, la partie information du public est, à toute fin pratique, la seule qui soit vraiment en voie de réalisation. Dans le but d’évaluer dans quelle mesure le programme a su rejoindre les clientèles jugées prioritaires et aussi pour connaître le niveau d’impact de ces cours, un projet pilote impliquant le Ministère des Affaires sociales, les quatre (4) Départements de santé communautaire concernés et cinq (5) hôpitaux avec département d’obstétrique a permis de rejoindre 1 933 femmes ayant accouché dans ces centres hospitaliers. Sur la base d’une comparaison entre celles qui avaient ou non suivi les cours prénatals, il a été possible de dégager des renseignements intéressants sur les deux aspects : atteinte des clientèles cibles et impact des cours. Après avoir fait état des résultats observés, on émet quelques commentaires sur certains éléments de la problématique des cours prénatals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207