MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Review of <i>Open Channel Hydraulics</i> , by Terry W. Sturm

2002· article· en· W2071383086 on OpenAlexaff
Faye Hicks

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulicsOpen-channel flowContext (archaeology)Channel (broadcasting)Momentum (technical analysis)Flow (mathematics)Calculus (dental)Conservation lawComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsSociologyMechanicsPhysicsGeologyTelecommunicationsEconomicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the proliferation during recent years of textbooks on the topic of open channel hydraulics, many academics and professionals are still waiting for a book of the caliber of Henderson’s and Chow’s texts to use in the classroom or to modernize their reference library. In Sturm’s Open Channel Hydraulics, aimed at senior undergraduates and first-year graduate students, the author attempts to fill this niche by initially approaching open channel hydraulics from a fundamental perspective of fluid mechanics, and leading through to practical applications and computational solutions. He has provided chapters on introductory steady flow topics, unsteady flow theory, and numerical solutions. He also discusses flood routing and unsteady flow approximations, and the important practical consideration of flow in alluvial channels. Sturm opens with a very nice introduction that includes a brief history of our knowledge of open channel hydraulics. The introduction is followed by an overview of the topic, given in terms of definitions of the various flow approximations commonly applied in practice, placing them in their proper theoretical context. The overview is followed by a derivation of the fundamental equations of mass, momentum, and energy conservation, done reasonably, particularly with the explanation of momentum conservation, and derivation of Bernoulli’s equation and momentum’s ultimate link to the concept of energy conservation. He is perhaps a bit too succinct with the derivation of the equation of conservation of energy itself, though this is understandable given the complexity of this undertaking from a pedagogical perspective. The author takes this opportunity to impress upon the student some important fundamental concepts, including the significance of the kinetic energy and momentum correction coefficients for nonuniform velocity distributions, a highly favorable approach for an educational text, and the concepts of surface resistance versus form drag. He then provides the student with an excellent explanation and justification of the need for, and details of the application of, dimensional analysis techniques. Rather useful practice problems, particularly for the dimensional analysis technique, are provided. Following in the form of Henderson, the next two chapters introduce the reader to energy and momentum concepts. The author brings a fresh approach to these topics and presents them in an interesting manner, with immediate reference to specific examples. In addition, the complexities raised by overbank flows are introduced ~specifically in terms of multiple minimum specific energies!. The inclusion of weirs, stilling basins, and supercritical expansions and contractions in these chapters put the theory in context, and also challenges the student with complex, as well as simpler, applications of the fundamental theory. The next two chapters cover uniform and gradually varied flow, again working from a fundamental level including dimensional analysis and fluid mechanics in the case of uniform flow,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydraulic EngineeringSame topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207