MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071389701 · doi:10.3917/riges.331.0010

Mentorat des entrepreneurs

2008· article· fr· W2071389701 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Pierre Simard, Julie Fortin

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicMentoring and Academic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Le mentorat est une relation interpersonnelle de soutien et d’échange dans laquelle une personne d’expérience (le mentor) déploie sa sagesse et son expertise afin de favoriser le développement d’une autre personne (le mentoré) qui a des compétences à acquérir et des objectifs à atteindre. Ainsi, au Canada, on assiste depuis quelques années à l’émergence d’une nouvelle forme d’aide visant à soutenir l’entrepreneuriat : le mentorat d’entrepreneurs. L’évaluation du programme de mentorat de la Fondation de l’entrepreneurship nous permet d’éclairer plusieurs dimensions de ce type de mentorat encore peu documenté : les raisons pour lesquelles les entrepreneurs recourent à un service de mentorat, la nature et l’appréciation des relations de mentorat et, enfin, les effets du mentorat perçus par les entrepreneurs. Cette recherche tend à montrer que le mentorat génère des effets bénéfiques tant pour l’entrepreneur que pour son entreprise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicMentoring and Academic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207