MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071409950 · doi:10.1002/qua.21157

Generalized electronic diabatic approach to structural similarity and the Hammond postulate

2006· article· en· W2071409950 on OpenAlexafffund
Gustavo A. Arteca, O. Tapia

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsDiabaticContext (archaeology)QuantumSimilarity (geometry)ChemistryElectronComplete active spaceReaction coordinateElectronic structurePhysicsQuantum mechanicsComputational chemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We revisit the notion of structural similarity along a reaction path within the context of a generalized electronic diabatic (GED) molecular model. In this approach, a reaction involving two closed‐shell stable species is described as the evolution of a quantum state that superimposes at least three diabatic electronic species (reactant, product, and an open‐shell transition state) coupled by an external electromagnetic field. Reactant and product amplitudes in this general state are also modulated by changing the geometry of a system of classical positive charges interacting with the electrons. By mapping these amplitudes over nuclear configurational space, we can follow the total quantum state along a reaction coordinate and establish its similarity to each of the diabatic species. As a result, chemical processes, and useful notions such as those of energy barriers and the Hammond postulate, emerge as consequence of Franck–Condon‐like transitions between quantum states. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2007

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Quantum ChemistrySame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207