Inexact Multistage Stochastic Quadratic Programming Method for Planning Water Resources Systems under Uncertainty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An inexact multistage stochastic quadratic programming (IMQP) method was developed for supporting water resources management under uncertainty. The IMQP method improves upon the existing multistage programming and inexact quadratic programming approaches, and can directly tackle uncertainties presented as interval numbers and probability distributions within a multistage context. Moreover, it can accommodate real-time dynamics of system uncertainties based on a complete set of scenarios; it can also deal with non-linearities in the objective function to reflect the effects of marginal utility on system benefits and costs. Because penalties are exercised with recourse against any infeasibility, the IMQP can support the analysis of various policy scenarios that are associated with different levels of economic consequences when the promised water-allocation targets are violated. The developed method was applied to the planning of water resources management in the Heshui River Basin, China. The results are useful for generating decision alternatives that correspond to various system conditions and for water resources managers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it