MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071468349 · doi:10.1016/j.hcmf.2013.12.007

Créer et maintenir de la valeur: Instaurer une culture d'amélioration continue

2014· article· fr· W2071468349 on OpenAlexaffabout
Saleem Chattergoon, Shelley Darling, Rob Devitt, Wolf Klassen

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsToronto East General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2011, le Toronto East General Hospital (TEGH) a entrepris de mettre sur pied une culture d'amélioration continue. Il a fini par adopter un système d'amélioration dans l'ensemble de son organisation grâce à son engagement envers la responsabilité financière, l'innovation pratique, la gestion du rendement des équipes et les systèmes de gestion quotidienne. Grâce à cette culture, le TEGH se targue du temps d'attente le moins long du réseau local d'intégration des services de santé à la salle d'urgence pour les patients admis et a réduit de 46 % le séjour hospitalier des patients atteints d'une maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.064
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0640.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0210.049
Scholarly communication0.0230.010
Open science0.0020.018
Research integrity0.0060.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.583
Teacher spread0.429 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Management ForumSame topicHealth Policy Implementation ScienceFrench-language works237,207