Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing ubiquity of smartphones and similar personal connected computational devices, each with a number of sensors, has created an opportunity for useful services based on crowd-sourced data. A busy professional could find a restaurant to go to for a quick lunch based on information available from smartphones of people already there having lunch, waiting to be seated, or even heading there, a government could conduct a census in real-time, or "sense" public opinion. Although the programming required for offering a new service of this sort can be significant if done from scratch, these applications have something in common: they use a similar pattern of coordinated communications between the various parties. This creates an opportunity to offer a set of coordination mechanisms as a platform to service designers, into which they can simply plug in their service specific code to offer a new service. This paper identifies the coordination mechanisms required for these crowd-sourced services as types of multi-origin communication. We present details of how these core mechanisms can be implemented using Actors, and introduce high-level programming constructs for launching a new service. Finally, we use examples to illustrate the implementation of services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".