MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071489834 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30564

Scoliosis in CHARGE: A prospective survey and two case reports

2005· article· en· W2071489834 on OpenAlexaff
Crystal Doyle, Kim Blake

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScoliosisMedicinePopulationCHARGE syndromePediatricsPhysical therapySurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CHARGE syndrome was first identified as a cluster of congenital anomalies in 1979 and has since undergone diagnostic criteria modifications to include the major and minor characteristics that occur during infancy and childhood. As the individuals with CHARGE syndrome have aged into their adolescents and adulthood, it has become increasingly common for them to develop scoliosis. This article presents an older population of individuals with CHARGE syndrome and describes the prevalence of scoliosis, and identifiable risk factors for scoliosis. Two case reports demonstrate the variability of scoliosis in CHARGE syndrome. A survey of adults and adolescents with CHARGE syndrome was completed to collect information about late onset medical issues, and those identifying scoliosis as an issue, were further followed for more information. The total population (n=31) and then the subgroup of individuals with scoliosis (n=19) were analyzed. Sixty one percent (19 of 31) of this population was diagnosed with scoliosis. The age of CHARGE syndrome diagnosis was later in the scoliosis population (6.3 years compared to 3.7 years in the no scoliosis population). Growth hormone use was reported in 7 of 31 of the individuals; 6 of these subsequently were diagnosed with scoliosis (32% of the scoliosis group). Of the scoliosis subgroup, most were mild scoliosis but eight were diagnosed with moderate to severe scoliosis, and all of these were treated with either a brace (n=5) or with surgical fusion (n=2) and one individual had both. Scoliosis in CHARGE syndrome individuals is more common than previously reported, and the age of onset is earlier than when routine monitoring for scoliosis is recommended. The prevalence of scoliosis in the CHARGE syndrome population is higher than in the general population therefore, it is very important for physicians to carefully monitor the spine for the development of scoliosis in children with CHARGE syndrome, especially if they are being treated with growth hormone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207