A Mirror for the Church: Preaching in the First Five Centuries (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: A Mirror for the Church: Preaching in the First Five Centuries Paul Scott Wilson A Mirror for the Church: Preaching in the First Five Centuries. By David Dunn-Wilson. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 2005. Pp. xvi, 224. $22.00 paperback.) David Dunn-Wilson, professor emeritus of theology at Kenya Methodist University, has written a detailed study of the patristic preaching that takes the reader from the early Christians to Leo the Great, focusing on sociological tensions that helped to shape preaching. Dunn-Wilson has a remarkable ability to make sermons come alive across the centuries; some sermons that might otherwise have seemed dull to the modern ear gain new vitality and energy. His aim is to show that the challenges of pluralism facing the church today are akin to the challenges facing the patristic church, and we can use it as a mirror in which to glimpse some ideas and possibilities for the way ahead. [End Page 101] Two things make this book stand out from classics like E. C. Dargan's A History of Preaching. The first is its reference to a vast number of primary sources—one hundred pages, almost half of the book, are devoted mainly to notes and bibliography. A large number of historical people and situations are covered, perhaps too many because exposure to actual sermons is diminished. Dunn-Wilson excels when he stops at someone's church to allow the reader to hear sermon excerpts and to overhear other scholars. O. C. Edwards' monumental two-volume A History of Preaching (Abingdon, 2004) may strike a better balance between in-depth study and sense of the period. A second distinctive feature is organization of the period around sociological situations. The book moves from primary evangelism to pastoral preachers who nurture apprentice-believers; to apologist preachers who reach into the pagan world with their defense of the faith; to ascetic and mystical preachers who argue against materialism; to liturgist preachers who equip the church to be the state religion; to theologian-preachers; and finally to the "majestic homileticians," Ambrose, Augustine, and Chrysostom, who "inspire the crew and train its officers to keep the church afloat" (p. 121). Of course, nothing about history is so neat; yet these divisions are practical and make for excellent reading. Dunn-Wilson tends to be descriptive rather than critical, and in general he seems to be looking for positive learnings from his period. He mentions without further comment the "ambivalent" attitude toward women (pp. 43, 102) and is silent about anti-Semitism in the patristic church, though he quotes anti-Semitic comments from sermons (pp. 38, 95). Some key books surprisingly are not mentioned, like Yngve Brilioth's A Brief History of Preaching, and C. H. Dodd's The Apostolic Preaching and Its Developments. Patristic hermeneutical practices like the four (or more) senses of scripture, allegory, and typology receive almost no attention. Also, one might wish that more than just the brief epilogue dealt with what the church today might learn from patristic preachers. Dunn-Wilson nonetheless gives a fine sense of them, their congregations, and their themes and shows how they adapted to meet the changing needs of their times. Paul Scott Wilson Emmanuel College in the University of Toronto Copyright © 2006 The Catholic University of America Press
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".