MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071493016 · doi:10.1139/o02-149

Origami in the outer membrane: the transmembrane arrangement of mitochondrial porins

2002· review· en· W2071493016 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Denice C. Bay, Deborah A. Court

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorinVoltage-dependent anion channelBacterial outer membraneTranslocase of the outer membraneAntiparallel (mathematics)BiologyTransmembrane proteinSequence (biology)BiochemistryBiophysicsPhysicsEscherichia coliGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voltage-dependent anion-selective channels (VDAC), also known as mitochondrial porins, are key regulators of metabolite flow across the mitochondrial outer membrane. Porins from a wide variety of organisms share remarkably similar electrophysiological properties, in spite of considerable sequence dissimilarity, indicating that they share a common structure. Based on primary sequence considerations, analogy with bacterial porins, and circular dichroism analysis, it is agreed that VDAC spans the outer membrane as a beta-barrel. However, the residues that form the antiparallel beta-strands comprising this barrel remain unknown. Various predictive methods, largely based on the known structures of bacterial beta-barrels, have been applied to the primary sequences of VDAC. Refinement and confirmation of these predictions have developed through numerous investigations of wild-type and variant porins, both in mitochondria and in artificial membranes. These experiments have involved VDAC from several sources, precluding the generation of a unified model. Herein, using the Neurospora VDAC sequence as a template, the published structural information and predictions have been reassessed to delineate a model that satisfies most of the available data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207