MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071497335 · doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2321037

Stabilizing a SISO LTI Plant With Gain and Delay Margins as Large as Desired

2014· article· en· W2071497335 on OpenAlexafffund
Darrell L. Gaudette, Daniel E. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Bounded functionLTI system theoryController (irrigation)Linear systemExponential stabilityNoise (video)ObservableRobust controlRobustness (evolution)MathematicsComputer scienceControl systemControl (management)Nonlinear systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Handling delays and uncertain parameters in control systems is difficult and of long-standing interest. In this paper, we consider the problem of bounded-input bounded-output stabilizing any single-input single-output linear time-invariant controllable/observable plant with gain and time delay margins as large as desired; to do so, we propose the use of a non-linear time varying (NLTV) controller. Despite being NLTV, the proposed controller is relatively simple and the time variation is periodic; furthermore, the controller is noise tolerant, guarantees the exponential decay of the plant initial conditions, tolerates occasional jumps in the gain and delay and is robust to un-modelled dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207