MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071620216 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564749

LQ control of a three-phase four-wire shunt active power filter based on three-level NPC inverter

2008· article· en· W2071620216 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Bachir Kedjar, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsFuelCell Energy (Canada)
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Total harmonic distortionHarmonicsAC powerPower factorEngineeringThree-phaseCapacitorVoltageComputer scienceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design and implementation of a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) with Integral action (LQIR) for a three-phase four-wire shunt active power filter using a three-level neutral point clamped inverter (SAF-NPC). The integral action is added so as to cancel the steady state errors for reference tracking or disturbance rejection knowing that the standard LQR provides only proportional gains. The controller is designed to achieve overall DC bus voltage regulation, unbalance voltage between the upper and lower capacitors, harmonics, reactive power and loadpsilas neutral current compensations. The converter model is set in the d-q-o rotating reference frame. The latter is augmented with the integral of the q component of the SAF-NPC currents, DC bus voltage unbalance and overall DC bus voltage to achieve integral action. The controllerpsilas performance depends on the weighting matrix, which is chosen to ensure satisfactory responses. The converter is controlled as a multi-input multi-output (MIMO) system and a fixed PWM at 2.34 kHz is used to generate the gating signals of the power devices. The system is tested for harmonics, reactive power and load unbalance compensation for balanced/unbalanced loads. The simulation results obtained with SPS and Simulink of Matlab show good performance in terms of overall DC bus voltage regulation, DC bus voltage unbalance compensation (small overshoot and very fast time response) and a low total harmonic distortion (THD) of ac line currents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207