MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071625933 · doi:10.17722/ijme.v4i1.180

Influence of Strategic Management Process on Trans-Nzoia Teachers Sacco Performance

2014· article· en· W2071625933 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Francis Otiato Kisia, Bichanga Walter Okibo, Robert M Wandera

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Management Excellence · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess managementBusinessProcess (computing)Operations managementIndustrial organizationComputer scienceEconomicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strategic management is the decision process that aligns the organizations’ internal capacity with the opportunities and threats it faces in the environment and is also an approach of specifying an organization’s objectives, developing strategies to achieve objectives and allocating resources to implement the strategies. Strategic management can be seen as a combination of strategy formulation, implementation and evaluation. Trans-Nzoia Teachers Sacco has undertaken strategic management process since 2005 with the aim of positioning the Sacco in the ever changing competitive business environment. No study has been done to a certain the effectiveness of the strategic management process on any organization hence  the purpose of this study was to establish the influence of strategic management process (comprising of environmental factors, strategy formulation and strategy control and monitoring) on Trans-Nzoia Teachers Sacco performance. The specific objectives of the study were to establish the influence of environment on Trans-Nzoia Teachers Sacco performance, establish the influence of strategy formulation on Trans-Nzoia Teachers Sacco    performance, and establish the influence of strategy Control and monitoring on Trans-Nzoia Teachers Sacco performance. The study was based on Trans-Nzoia Teachers Sacco, the theories reviewed were profit maximizing, Competition based, resource based, survival based, contingency and system perspective theories. Descriptive research was carried out simple random sampling method was used. The target population was 3452 consisting of the board, Members and employees of Trans-Nzoia Teachers Sacco Society limited., stratified random sampling method was used to select  the sample size of 44 ,. The questionnaires were used to collect data from the respondents. Stepwise multiple regressions was used to analyze the data and identify predictors of Sacco performance. The main findings of the study were that the research variables of environment, strategy formulation and strategy control and monitoring had positive effect on Sacco performance and directly influence the Sacco performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Management ExcellenceSame topicGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementFrench-language works237,207