MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071630249 · doi:10.1115/pvp2002-1287

Inclusion of Local Shell Behavior of Tubes Into a Two-Dimensional Beam Approximation of Deformation in Nuclear Fuel Channels

2002· article· en· W2071630249 on OpenAlexaff
S. Khajehpour, R. G. Sauve ́, N. Badie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Canadian institutionsKinectrics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeformation (meteorology)Finite element methodShell (structure)Beam (structure)CreepMaterials scienceTube (container)StiffnessMechanicsStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method has been developed to incorporate the local three-dimensional shell behavior of two concentric tubes in the two-dimensional beam modeling of the problem. The two dimensional modeling of fuel channels in CANDU pressurized heavy water nuclear reactors is used in lieu of a more accurate three dimensional finite element approach in order to reduce the on-line simulation time which greatly affects the SLAR (Spacer Location And Repositioning) maintenance operation cost during outage. However, effort must be made to include the three-dimensional shell behavior of these channels into the two-dimensional modeling. In recent studies a nonlinear force-dependent model for contact stiffness between the calandria tube and pressure tube has been developed. However, local deformation of calandria the tube at spacer locations due to in-reactor creep leads to settling of the spacer into the calandria tube that consequently reduces the gap between the two tubes. In this work, the effect of local deformation (elastic and creep) of calandria tubes on modeling of contact at spacer locations is assessed using a three dimensional finite element code. The result is incorporated into a two-dimensional beam model of the problem as a reduction in size of the spacers that separate the two tubes. It is shown that the proposed method increases the accuracy of prediction of contact time and the spacer. In general, the method described in this paper suggests a way to incorporate local shell deformation into beam models of slender shell structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMechanical stress and fatigue analysisFrench-language works237,207