MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EcoSummit 2007 and beyond

2007· review· en· W2071663428 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicScience and Climate Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeijingChinaEcologyPolitical scienceSociologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EcoSummit 2007, which took place in Beijing, China in May, hosted over 1400 participants from more than 70 countries. The event was organized by the Ecological Society of China and Elsevier, and was co-sponsored by 29 major national, regional, and international ecological organizations and societies, including many Chinese scientific organizations. EcoSummit was initiated in the mid-1990s by the chief editors of Elsevier's three primary ecology journals, to foster dialogue and interaction among ecologists. The first EcoSummit was held in Copenhagen, Denmark in 1996, and the second in Halifax, Canada in 2000. However, those initial meetings attracted very limited attention from the ecological community. In organizing the third EcoSummit, we recognized that times had changed. Ecological science must not focus only on the development of theories and the understanding of ecological mechanisms, but also on the application of ecological principles to protect and restore ecosystems. We can no longer strive simply to generate academic papers, but must also promote public awareness and present ecological principles and knowledge to policy makers, planners, and managers, in plain language that can be understood by all. We felt strongly that there was a need for the ecological community to have a new kind of EcoSummit, a platform from which to fully engage not only ecologists, but a much broader audience, representative of the entirety of human society. The Beijing EcoSummit, the first to be held in a developing country, successfully attracted broad representation from various sectors and highlighted the determination of the ecological community to achieve the United Nations' millennium development goals. China, with the world's fastest growing economy and concomitant impacts on the regional and global environment, seemed a logical choice for this event, particularly in view of its ongoing preparations for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. At the end of this year's EcoSummit, participants adopted the Beijing Ecological Declaration, entitled A world role for ecology: the key to life. The Declaration begins, “Ecology is at the heart of many of our everyday concerns. It is the key to solving many problems of human interactions with natural systems. Ecology can help us design, plan, manage, and protect our environment to ensure that we can all enjoy healthier lives and pass on a good environment for our grandchildren to appreciate. Ecology must be a factor in policy decision making. Without understanding ecology, we risk building up problems for the future, from increasing the rate of land degradation and the loss of plant and animal life, to worsening the present global climate change.” Our hope is that future EcoSummit meetings will encourage even greater integration of natural and social sciences with the policy and decision-making community. The aim is to develop a better understanding of the complex nature of ecological systems and to provide opportunities for dialogue among researchers, planners, decision makers, and practitioners in ecology and related disciplines, with emphasis on the interdisciplinary, interorganizational, and inter-regional issues related to global sustainability. EcoSummits are not meant to compete with society conferences, but rather to be complementary and mutually beneficial. In this new era, ecological science should not be insular. Instead, it must influence, and be influenced by society and the economy, and it must partner with other disciplines. In order to solve today's environmental problems, ecology must employ tools from outside the field – new technologies, for example – to understand complex ecological relationships. Only by achieving this will it be possible to bring socioeconomic needs and environmental preservation into harmony. Ecological science must play a vital role in promoting sustainability on this crowded, rapidly changing, and fragile planet. The Beijing Ecological Declaration ended with a strong appeal to the world. The scientists at this year's EcoSummit called for humanity to prevent further ecological deterioration of the Earth. This will require developing and enforcing environmental laws and regulations, and upholding and applying international conventions. It also demands the utmost collaboration between civil society, governments, and scientists in applying ecological principles to everyday life. Our future is in our own hands. Ecology is one of the tools we must use to make this a better world. The next EcoSummit will be held in Africa in 2011, and will be announced in 2008. For further information, visit www.ecosummit2007.elsevier.com.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it