MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2071663428 · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[287:eab]2.0.co;2

EcoSummit 2007 and beyond

2007· review· en· W2071663428 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment · 2007
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueScience and Climate Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBeijingChinaEcologyPolitical scienceSociologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

EcoSummit 2007, which took place in Beijing, China in May, hosted over 1400 participants from more than 70 countries. The event was organized by the Ecological Society of China and Elsevier, and was co-sponsored by 29 major national, regional, and international ecological organizations and societies, including many Chinese scientific organizations. EcoSummit was initiated in the mid-1990s by the chief editors of Elsevier's three primary ecology journals, to foster dialogue and interaction among ecologists. The first EcoSummit was held in Copenhagen, Denmark in 1996, and the second in Halifax, Canada in 2000. However, those initial meetings attracted very limited attention from the ecological community. In organizing the third EcoSummit, we recognized that times had changed. Ecological science must not focus only on the development of theories and the understanding of ecological mechanisms, but also on the application of ecological principles to protect and restore ecosystems. We can no longer strive simply to generate academic papers, but must also promote public awareness and present ecological principles and knowledge to policy makers, planners, and managers, in plain language that can be understood by all. We felt strongly that there was a need for the ecological community to have a new kind of EcoSummit, a platform from which to fully engage not only ecologists, but a much broader audience, representative of the entirety of human society. The Beijing EcoSummit, the first to be held in a developing country, successfully attracted broad representation from various sectors and highlighted the determination of the ecological community to achieve the United Nations' millennium development goals. China, with the world's fastest growing economy and concomitant impacts on the regional and global environment, seemed a logical choice for this event, particularly in view of its ongoing preparations for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. At the end of this year's EcoSummit, participants adopted the Beijing Ecological Declaration, entitled A world role for ecology: the key to life. The Declaration begins, “Ecology is at the heart of many of our everyday concerns. It is the key to solving many problems of human interactions with natural systems. Ecology can help us design, plan, manage, and protect our environment to ensure that we can all enjoy healthier lives and pass on a good environment for our grandchildren to appreciate. Ecology must be a factor in policy decision making. Without understanding ecology, we risk building up problems for the future, from increasing the rate of land degradation and the loss of plant and animal life, to worsening the present global climate change.” Our hope is that future EcoSummit meetings will encourage even greater integration of natural and social sciences with the policy and decision-making community. The aim is to develop a better understanding of the complex nature of ecological systems and to provide opportunities for dialogue among researchers, planners, decision makers, and practitioners in ecology and related disciplines, with emphasis on the interdisciplinary, interorganizational, and inter-regional issues related to global sustainability. EcoSummits are not meant to compete with society conferences, but rather to be complementary and mutually beneficial. In this new era, ecological science should not be insular. Instead, it must influence, and be influenced by society and the economy, and it must partner with other disciplines. In order to solve today's environmental problems, ecology must employ tools from outside the field – new technologies, for example – to understand complex ecological relationships. Only by achieving this will it be possible to bring socioeconomic needs and environmental preservation into harmony. Ecological science must play a vital role in promoting sustainability on this crowded, rapidly changing, and fragile planet. The Beijing Ecological Declaration ended with a strong appeal to the world. The scientists at this year's EcoSummit called for humanity to prevent further ecological deterioration of the Earth. This will require developing and enforcing environmental laws and regulations, and upholding and applying international conventions. It also demands the utmost collaboration between civil society, governments, and scientists in applying ecological principles to everyday life. Our future is in our own hands. Ecology is one of the tools we must use to make this a better world. The next EcoSummit will be held in Africa in 2011, and will be announced in 2008. For further information, visit www.ecosummit2007.elsevier.com.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,982
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,925

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle