MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2071671853 · doi:10.1139/o01-023

Lipid microspheres incorporated by U937 cells via their specific receptors

2001· article· en· W2071671853 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kimihiro Suzuki, Toshihiko Hidaka, Tadashi Shinohara, Kouji Kataharada, Makoto Okada, Kunio Takada, Fumitaka Ohsuzu

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsU937 cellReceptorLiposomeBiochemistryChemistryLecithinCellMolecular biologyBiologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipid microspheres (LM), currently in clinical use as drug carriers, mainly consist of soybean oil as a core and lecithin as a surfactant. The purpose of our study wass to determine whether or not LM incorporation is receptor-mediated. U937 cells resuspended in a serum-free medium abundantly took up unmodulated LM. A binding study showed that U937 cells had a single binding site for LM (410 sites/cell at 24 degrees C; 100 sites/cell at 4 degrees C). Inhibition assays revealed that lecithin liposome, lysophosphatidylcholines, activated alpha2-macroglobulin, and HDL did not affect the binding of LM to U937 cells. VLDL strongly, and LDL and AcLDL moderately, inhibited the binding of LM to U937 cells. Ligand blotting analysis revealed that unmodulated LM in an apoprotein-free buffer directly bound to a 40 kDa protein in the cell membrane fraction. These results suggest that LM that is not modulated by any protein is incorporated by specific cells via receptor-mediated processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell Biology→Same topicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior→French-language works237,207→