MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071709409 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139057516.017

O

2011· book-chapter· en· W2071709409 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Henry Petroski

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDesign Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeremonyEngineeringRing (chemistry)Order (exchange)State (computer science)Engineering physicsHistoryArchaeologyComputer scienceChemistryBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Order of the Engineer. As early as the 1950s, some Ohio engineers began to look into extending the Canadian Iron Ring Ceremony into the United States; however, it was not until 1970 that the first American ring ceremony was held at Cleveland State University. Local chapters of the Order of the Engineer, known as Links, began to form, first around Ohio, but then increasingly throughout the country. The movement has continued to spread, but the practice of American engineers wearing a stainless steel pinkie ring has not grown to nearly the extent that Canadian engineers wear their iron (now also mostly stainless steel) rings. See Homer T. Borton, “The Order of the Engineer,” The Bent of Tau Beta Pi, Spring 1978, pp. 35–37; “The Iron Ring,” American Scientist, May–June 1995, pp. 229–232; To Forgive Design: Understanding Failure (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, forthcoming), chapter 8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicDesign Education and PracticeFrench-language works237,207