Severe dose inaccuracies caused by an oxygen-antioxidant imbalance in normoxic polymer gel dosimeters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two oxygen scavengers have been successfully tested to produce normoxic polymer gel dosimeters under normal atmospheric conditions. The first is ascorbic acid and the second is a chloride (also sulfate) salt of tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphonium. These antioxidants, added to the dosimeter during gel preparation, chemically remove dissolved oxygen that otherwise inhibits propagation of the polymerization reaction during irradiation of the dosimeter. These gel dosimeters are radiosensitive after manufacture under normoxic conditions. However, we show herein that the accuracy of the dosimetric measurement is compromised due to chemical reactions of the antioxidant with radicals. In addition, we provide evidence that both antioxidant and oxygen act as radical scavengers that affect the amount of polymer formed in the gel dosimeter. This can result in important dose inaccuracies in both methacrylic acid-based and acrylamide-based normoxic dosimeter gels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".