Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malazarte, peça de Graça Aranha estreada em 1911, em Paris, é uma amostra significativa de como o simbolismo europeu influenciou a dramaturgia pré-modernista brasileira. No palco, os personagens não servem tanto à ação, mas a uma discussão filosófica norteada pelos questionamentos morais de Nietzsche questionamentos deliberadamente irracionais e perfeitos para o ideal simbolista do período. Um paralelo entre Canaã romance anterior de Graça Aranha que também discute as idéias de Nietzsche e Malazarte é possível e revela como as convicções filosóficas do autor transformaramse num curto período de tempo. Ainda que a peça tenha fracassado como solução estética, a obra é uma tentativa de modernização da dramaturgia brasileira em um momento em que o país carecia de grupos teatrais profissionais. Abstract Malazarte, a play by Graça Aranha, which premiered in 1911, in Paris, shows distinctively the influence Brazilian pre-modernist playwrights received from symbolism. On stage, characters do not really serve the action, but rather some philosophical discussion guided by Nietzsches moral inquirings inquirings meant to be irrational and, as such, perfect to the symbolist ideal of those days. It is possible to see some correspondences between Malazarte and Canaã a novel written previously by the author, and also discussing Nietzsches ideas and this comparison can show how the philosophic convictions of the author evolved over a short period of time. Though the play has failed as an aesthetic solution, the work is an attempt to update Brazilian theatre in a moment when the country lacked professional theatrical groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".