MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071755577 · doi:10.1080/00071668.2013.847526

Minimum light intensity threshold to prevent negative effects on broiler production and welfare

2013· article· en· W2071755577 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Poultry Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroilerAnimal scienceIntensity (physics)Light intensityRandomized block designAbdominal fatFeed conversion ratioBiologyWeight gainBody weightVeterinary medicineMedicineEndocrinologyPhysicsHorticultureOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Research focused on lower light intensity levels is required to set minimum standards appropriate for production and welfare of intensively housed broilers. The objective of this research was to study light intensity (0.1 to 10 lx) effects on Ross × Ross 308 and 708 genotypes. 2. Three experiments (35 d each) using 18 720 broilers were conducted with the initial experiment using two replicates of 0.1, 1, 5 and 10 lx. The second and third experiments examined 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 lx with treatments replicated twice in each experiment in a randomised complete block design with experiment acting as a block. In each experiment, mixed sex broilers from each genotype were housed in 6 equally sized pens per room. 3. In Experiment 1, the introduction of 0.1 lx at d 7 caused high levels of mortality and poor growth rate from d 7 to 14 and was discontinued. 4. In Experiments 2 and 3, increasing light intensity increased body weight gain (0-35 d) and feed intake (0-35 d) in a quadratic and linear fashion, respectively. Similarly, mortality corrected gain to feed ratio (FCR, 0-35 d) demonstrated a quadratic response with a maximum at 5 lx. Carcass, breast meat and skin, abdominal fat and drum skin, as a percentage of live weight, increased while drum bone and wing yield decreased in a linear fashion with increasing light intensity. Total carcass composition was unaffected by light intensity. 5. Genotype effects were numerous. No interactions were found between genotype and light intensity. 6. Ocular dimensions and the incidence of foot pad lesions decreased in a quadratic and linear fashion, respectively, with increasing light intensity. In contrast, welfare-associated gait score and mortality levels were not affected by light intensity. 7. It was concluded that performance, breast meat yield and bird welfare improved with increasing light intensity. The data support 5 lx as a minimum light intensity in broiler production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it