Bibliographic record
Abstract
S’il est un phénomène crucial pour comprendre l’Antiquité chrétienne, c’est bien celui de la conversion. Nous n’avons évidemment pas accès directement au phénomène ni aux motifs intimes d’une conversion. Ce que l’on possède, ce sont des récits proposant des modèles, les plus connus, ceux de Paul et d’Augustin, ayant servi d’exemples de siècle en siècle. La littérature apocryphe étant moins étudiée sous cet aspect que le reste de la littérature chrétienne, je voudrais explorer ce phénomène en un texte particulier, les Actes d’André, datés de la deuxième moitié du second siècle de notre ère ou du début du processus graduel, ce qui peut inclure une expérience-choc à un moment particulier de ce processus, ensuite comme espace de construction d’une nouvelle identité et comme médiation entre la nouvelle religion et la vision générale du monde de l’époque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".