MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tissue sensitivity to thyroid hormone in athyroid <i>Xenopus laevis</i> larvae

2003· article· en· W2071795079 on OpenAlexafffund
Irena Rot, Richard J. Wassersug

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopment Growth & Differentiation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthKillam Trusts
KeywordsMetamorphosisTadpole (physics)XenopusThyroidBiologyLarvaHormoneInternal medicineEndocrinologyNeotenyAnatomyZoologyEcologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tadpoles that spontaneously arrest development and remain as larvae occur occasionally in Xenopus laevis populations. These non-metamorphosing tadpoles continue to grow, and they develop into grossly deformed giant individuals which come as close as any anurans to being truly neotenic. Giant X. laevis tadpoles that fail to metamorphose lack thyroid glands. In this study, the hypothesis that the tissues of these tadpoles nevertheless remain thyroid hormone sensitive was tested, by exposing isolated tadpole tail tips to exogenous thyroid hormone in tissue culture. The tail tips from giant tadpoles significantly shrank in response to the thyroid hormone treatment, showing that their tissue was still capable of metamorphosis. However, the amount of shrinkage was less than that observed in tail tissue from normal tadpoles. It was hypothesized that complete induction of metamorphosis may not be possible in the giant tadpoles due to a disproportionate growth and development of tissues and organs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopment Growth & DifferentiationSame topicAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFrench-language works237,207