MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071848798 · doi:10.1109/riiss.2014.7009184

Robot team learning enhancement using Human Advice

2014· article· en· W2071848798 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Girard, Bahman Emami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAction selectionTask (project management)Artificial intelligenceMarkov decision processHuman–robot interactionMixture modelRobotProcess (computing)ForagingHidden Markov modelMachine learningAction (physics)Mechanism (biology)Task analysisLayer (electronics)Human–computer interactionSelection (genetic algorithm)Gaussian processMarkov processGaussianPsychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper discusses the augmentation of the Concurrent Individual and Social Learning (CISL) mechanism with a new Human Advice Layer (HAL). The new layer is characterized by a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), which is trained on human experience data. The CISL mechanism consists of the Individual Performance and Task Allocation Markov Decision Processes (MDP), and the HAL can provide preferred action selection policies to the individual agents. The data utilized for training the GMM is collected using a heterogeneous team foraging simulation. When leveraging human experience in the multi-agent learning process, the team performance is enhanced significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207