Oral administration of sodium tungstate improves cardiac performance in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Normalization of hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia is an important objective in preventing diabetes-induced cardiac dysfunction. Our study investigated the effects of sodium tungstate on cardiac performance in streptozotocin-induced (STZ) diabetic rats based on its potential antidiabetic and antioxidant activity. Male Wistar rats were made STZ-diabetic and then treated with tungstate in their drinking water for 9 weeks. Body mass, food and fluid intake, plasma glucose, insulin, triglyceride, and free fatty acids levels were measured. At the termination of the study period, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed, and cardiac performance was evaluated using an isolated working heart apparatus. Tungstate-treated STZ-diabetic rats showed a significant reduction in fluid and food intake, plasma glucose, triglycerides, and free fatty acid levels, and improved tolerance to glucose in OGTT, owing to tungstate-mediated enhancement of insulin activity rather than increased insulin levels. Left ventricular pressure development, the rate of contraction (+dP/dT), and the rate of relaxation (-dP/dT) were significantly improved in tungstate-treated diabetic rats. Apart from a decreased rate of body mass gain, no other signs of toxicity or hypoglycemic episodes were observed in tungstate-treated rats. This study extends previous observations on the antidiabetic activities of tungstate, and also reports for the first time the salutary effects in preventing diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".