Effect of zeolitization on the volume-change behaviour of kaolinitic soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An attempt has been made to study the effect of zeolite formation on the volume-change behaviour of kaolinitic soil. This is studied in terms of two criteria, namely concentration and period of interaction. Conventional consolidation tests have been carried out to determine the extent of change in swell and compressibility of kaolinitic soils remoulded with water and inundated with an alkali solution. It was observed that abnormal swell occurs during unloading when specimens were inundated with a 4N alkali solution. While allowing a longer interaction period at 6.25 kPa, it was found that swelling in kaolinitic soils is induced after time lags of 30 and 15 days on inundation with 1N and 4N alkali solutions, respectively. Equilibrium is reached after 50–70 days in kaolinitic soils, however, and loading was undertaken later. A 16% swelling was observed in kaolinitic soils when inundated with a 4N alkali solution, indicating that zeolitization of kaolinite results in swelling at the seating load provided the period of interaction is sufficient. X-ray diffraction studies confirm the formation of zeolite.Key words: alkali, consolidation, kaolinite, swelling, X-ray diffraction, zeolite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".