Conflits hydrauliques et guerres de l'eau : un essai de modélisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Dans le contexte actuel de changements climatiques et d'augmentation des besoins alimentaires, la pression sur la ressource hydraulique s'accentue fortement : l'eau est devenue un enjeu politique majeur, et sa maîtrise, ainsi que son partage, de potentielles sources de conflits. Ceux-ci peuvent être interétatiques, ou internes et de basse intensité : dans les deux cas, ces conflits hydrauliques ne font souvent qu'exacerber des tensions déjà bien présentes au sein de relations préalablement dégradées entre États ou communautés ; mais poussés à l'extrême, ils pourraient déboucher sur de véritables « guerres de l'eau ». Le potentiel de conflit croît avec la rapidité de la rupture hydraulique, qui introduit la rareté en eau, à laquelle les sociétés sont plus ou moins sensibles en fonction de leur « capacité sociale d'adaptation ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".