MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071880086 · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.062718

Nonperturbative calculation of projectile-electron loss, target ionization, and capture in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ne</mml:mi></mml:math>collisions

2001· article· lv· W2071880086 on OpenAlexafffund
Tom Kirchner, Marko Horbatsch

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2001
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsProjectileElectronPauli exclusion principleAtomic physicsIonizationElectron captureRange (aeronautics)Charge (physics)Generator (circuit theory)IonNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ${\mathrm{He}}^{+}$ + Ne collision system, in which the projectile electron as well as the target electrons undergo inelastic transitions is investigated in the independent-particle model with a time-dependent screening potential. We use the basis generator method to solve the single-particle equations for all electrons and combine the transition probabilities statistically to calculate charge-state correlated and more inclusive total cross sections in the energy range of 10 to 1000 keV/amu. Good agreement with available experimental data is found except for the lowest projectile energies, where it is indicated that a more refined dynamical screening model is required. We demonstrate the importance of Pauli blocking for the electron transfer to the dressed projectile and discuss the role of the electron-electron interaction between projectile and target electrons, which is not included in our model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207