Rapid Effects of Hypoxia on the Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of Adenosine and Related Metabolites in Newborn and One-Month-Old Piglets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of hypoxia on the levels of adenosine, inosine and hypoxanthine in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was determined by HPLC in newborn (1- to 3-day-old, n = 6) and 1-month-old (n = 5) piglets. Serial CSF samples (q 60 s) were obtained from the cisterna magna during normoxia and a 5-min hypoxia test (PaO2 = 26.5 +/- 2.9 Torr). In normoxia, newborns had a lower mean (+/- SEM) CSF concentration of adenosine (0.72 +/- 0.17 vs 2.60 +/- 0.44 microM) and a higher concentration of hypoxanthine (4.88 +/- 0.41 vs. 1.39 +/- 0.60 microM) than the mature piglets (p less than 0.05). In all animals, hypoxia induced an increase in CSF levels of adenosine and its metabolites between 2 and 4 min. However, peak adenosine concentrations were higher in mature (4.17 +/- 1.41 microM) than in newborn (1.55 +/- 0.29 microM) piglets (p less than 0.05). These data might explain deficient vasodilator adaptation required for neonatal CBF regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".