MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071906280 · doi:10.1002/cpe.663

Providing soft real‐time quality of service guarantees for Java threads

2003· article· en· W2071906280 on OpenAlexaff
James C. Pang, Gholamali C. Shoja, Eric G. Manning

Bibliographic record

VenueConcurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceJavaOperating systemThread (computing)Quality of serviceScheduling (production processes)Virtual machineJava concurrencyOverhead (engineering)Java appletDistributed computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Java platform has many characteristics that make it very desirable for integrated continuous media processing. Unfortunately, it lacks the necessary CPU resource management facilities to support quality of service (QoS) guarantees for soft real‐time multimedia tasks. In this paper, we present our new Java Virtual Machine, Q‐JVM, which brings CPU resource management to the Java platform. Q‐JVM is based on Sun's JVM version 1.1.5. It implements an enhanced version of the MTR‐LS algorithm in its thread scheduler. Combined with admission control that could be implemented in an application‐level resource manager, it is able to support QoS parameters such as fairness, bandwidth partitioning and delay bound guarantees, as well as the cumulative service guarantee. Our test results show that Q‐JVM is backward compatible with the standard JVM from Sun, has low scheduling overhead, and is able to provide QoS guarantees as specified. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConcurrency and Computation Practice and ExperienceSame topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207