Cyproheptadine for central hypertension?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Approximately one-fifth of paediatric intracranial tumors result in hypertension. The condition is difficult to treat in this population, particularly if it is refractory, since there is little guidance on patient management beyond first-line therapy with IV labetalol. Methods: A 20-month-old patient was hospitalized with cerebral herniation-induced loss of consciousness and a posterior fossa mass was found. Although several first-line treatments including IV labetalol, furosemide, amlodipine, clonidine, and atenolol were administered, the patient's hypertension persisted. With few options left, positive findings from previously published case reports led the team to administer cyproheptadine. Results: Cyproheptadine resulted in improved blood pressure and allowed for a dose reduction in other antihypertensives, but elevated liver transaminases and suspected hepatotoxicity several weeks later resulted in the discontinuation of this treatment. Conclusions: Despite the safety concerns associated with using cyproheptadine to treat paediatric central hypertension, this treatment holds promise for persistent refractory hypertension as a last-line agent when all other treatment options are exhausted. Clinical use of this agent should be investigated in future studies, under careful supervision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".