MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071915070 · doi:10.1139/v01-045

Scope and limitations of ruthenium-catalyzed metathesis of simple polymer-bound alkenes

2001· article· en· W2071915070 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter G Breed, James A. Ramsden, John M. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMetathesisRutheniumAlkeneSalt metathesis reactionCatalysisPolymer chemistryEtherOrganic chemistryPolymerPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthetic procedures for the preparation of two types of functional resin are described, both based on 2% cross-linked polystyrene with a high density (>60%) of side-chains and terminated by a primary alcohol. In the first case the C11 side-chain is linked to the polymer through a sulfide, and in the second an ether linkage is employed to incorporate a (CH2CH2O)4 unit. In both cases the resins have 13C NMR spectra that are informative in the chain terminus region without special operating conditions. Model intermolecular metathesis reactions were carried out on allylcarbamic acid tert-butyl ester and various alkenes with Grubbs' catalyst. On the basis of these experiments, gel-phase metathesis was successfully demonstrated between a polymer-bound allyl ether and simple symmetrical disubstituted alkenes, monitoring the extent of reaction by 13C NMR. These reactions did not go to completion even with recycling and some evidence for competing interchain metathesis is presented, based on the increased broadening and reduced mobility of the ensuing polymer.Key words: alkene metathesis, ruthenium, gel-phase, 13C NMR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207