MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071926512 · doi:10.1159/000132978

Fine mapping of the long arm of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridization using different translocations, including the t(11;22) of Ewing sarcoma

2008· article· en· W2071926512 on OpenAlex
D. Bérubé, E. Passage, Marie‐Geneviève Mattéi, J. F. Mattéi, R. Gagné

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetics and Cell Genetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPorphobilinogen deaminaseGeneChromosomal translocationGeneticsGene mappingNeural cell adhesion moleculeMolecular biologyCoding regionChromosomeChromosome 7 (human)Chromosome 17 (human)CellCell adhesion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The progesterone receptor gene (PGR), the gene coding for porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD), the gene coding for a neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), the oncogene ETS1, and the anonymous genomic sequence D11S29 have been previously located on the long arm of chromosome 11. However, gene localizations obtained with different gene-mapping procedures have led to occasional discrepancies. To localize these genes more precisely, we hybridized five human DNA sequences with different chromosomal rearrangements, including four balanced and one unbalanced translocations. We show here that the order of these five sequences is cen-PGR-PBGD-DIIS29/NCAM/ETS1-tel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it