MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071939379 · doi:10.1521/capn.2006.11.6.1

An Update on the Pathophysiology of Major Depression: Neurophysiology for Clinicians

2006· article· en· W2071939379 on OpenAlexaff
Glenda MacQueen

Bibliographic record

VenueChild and Adolescent Psychopharmacology News · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathophysiologyDepression (economics)NeurophysiologyMedicineClinical neurophysiologyNeurosciencePsychologyIntensive care medicinePsychiatryInternal medicineElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Work from the last decade has resulted in exciting findings regarding brain changes associated with depression as cutting edge neuroscience has been brought to bear on the pathophysiology of major depression and other psychiatric illnesses. Here we review a current model that links stress, depression and antidepressant effect to cellular and molecular changes in the hippocampus, one of several brain regions implicated in the pathophysiology of depression. There are emerging classes of medication that do not appear to directly modulate monoamines (serotonin, norepinephrine or dopamine) but have antidepressant effects. It is currently unknown whether these medications will have neurobiological effects similar to those discussed below. Therefore instead of referring to antidepressant medication generally, the discussion refers to monoamine modulating antidepressant medications (MMAMs) which primarily include the serotonin reuptake inhibitors, noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors and monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChild and Adolescent Psychopharmacology NewsSame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207