MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071956047 · doi:10.1080/02699050110103931

Intracerebral haemorrhage in previously healthy adults following aerobic and anaerobic exercise

2002· review· en· W2071956047 on OpenAlexaff
Barry Cayen, Nora Cullen

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Injury · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaerobic exerciseMedicineAerobic exerciseYoung adultPhysical therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) without demonstrated tissue pathology in previously healthy adults has not been previously linked to anaerobic or aerobic exercise. The possible mechanisms and risk factors for ICH that may be found in a young, "healthy" adult are described. RESEARCH DESIGN: Case reports of two patients who suffered a frontal lobe ICH following aerobic and anaerobic exercise are presented. A review of the literature was carried out to elucidate the risk factors for ICH in previously healthy adults. MAIN OUTCOMES: Hypocholesterolemia below 4.14 mmol/l, phenylpropanolamine use above 75 mg per day and certain apolipoprotein phenotypes (Apo E2 and Apo E4), which can all be found in young, healthy adults have all been described in the literature as contributors to the risk of ICH. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for these risk factors to be researched in more detail, given that potential risk modifiers may help decrease their posed threat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain InjurySame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207