Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homodesmotic reactions were designed to study substituent effects on stability of oxiranes, oxirenes, and dioxiranes. Good or fair correlation between their homodesmotic stabilization energies and Taft's dual-substituent-parameters has been found. Oxiranes are stabilized by σ-donating and π-donating substituents but destabilized by σ-accepting and π-accepting substituents. The π-effects on oxiranes are comparable to σ-effects for π-acceptor substituents and are much stronger than σ-effects for π-donor substituents. Oxirenes are stabilized by σ-donating, π-donating, and π-accepting substituents but destabilized by σ-accepting substituents. The π-effects on oxirenes are stronger than σ-effects. Oxirenes with strong π-donor substituents such as F, OH, and NH 2 , or strong σ-donor substituents such as Li and Na are neither real molecules nor transition states. Dioxiranes are stabilized by σ-donating and π-donating substituents but destabilized by σ-accepting and π-accepting substituents. The π-effects on dioxiranes are stronger than σ-effects for π-donor substituents, but weaker than σ-effects for π-acceptor substituentsKey words: oxirane, oxirene, dioxirane, homodesmotic reaction, substituent effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".