MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071980071 · doi:10.1115/1.2913045

Uniform Stresses Inside an Elliptical Inhomogeneity With an Imperfect Interface in Plane Elasticity

2008· article· en· W2071980071 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Mechanics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElasticity (physics)Stress fieldIsotropyImperfectHydrostatic stressStress (linguistics)MechanicsHydrostatic equilibriumPlane (geometry)Materials scienceField (mathematics)Matrix (chemical analysis)GeometryMathematical analysisPhysicsMathematicsComposite materialOpticsFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider an elliptical inhomogeneity embedded in an infinite isotropic elastic matrix subjected to in-plane deformations under the assumption of remote uniform loading. The inhomogeneity-matrix interface is assumed to be imperfect, which is simulated by the spring-layer model with vanishing thickness. Its behavior is based on the assumption that tractions are continuous but displacements are discontinuous across the interface. We further assume that the same degree of imperfection on the interface is realized in both the normal and tangential directions. We find a form of interface function, which leads to uniform stress field within the elliptical inhomogeneity. The explicit expressions for the uniform stress field within the elliptical inhomogeneity are derived. The obtained results are verified by comparison with existing solutions. The condition under which the internal stress field is not only uniform but also hydrostatic is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it