Fatigue failure of adhesively patched 2024‐T3 and 7075‐T6 clad and bare aluminium alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The fatigue behaviour of adhesive patches used for repairing aircraft components was investigated. Adhesive patches were simulated using single‐lap shear specimens on clad and bare 7075‐T6 and 2024‐T3 aluminium alloy substrates. Stress–life curves were generated under constant amplitude loading at three stress ratios: R =−1, 0 and 0.5. In the bare materials, failure always occurred in the adhesive itself leaving the substrates intact. At fatigue lives below about 100 000 cycles, the clad alloy specimens also failed in this manner. However, at lower stress levels, the clad alloys failed by cracks initiating in the cladding layer along the end of the lap and subsequently propagating through the substrate. The fatigue strength of the substrate, due to the adhesive patch on the clad materials, was reduced by an order of magnitude compared to the Military Handbook values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".